Haun v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/2017 ORDERING that defendant shall respond to the complaint and serve a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative record on or before 2/2/2017. Plaintiff shall serve new evidence and/or a confidential settlement letter to Defendant on or before 3/6/2017. Defendant shall serve her response to Plaintiff's confidential settlement letter on or before 4/5/2017. In the event the parties do not agree to remand, Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment on or before 5/10/2017. Defendant shall file her response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before 6/9/2017. Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before 6/29/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration SHARON LAHEY California State Bar No. 263027 Special Assistant United States Attorney 6 7 8 9 10 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8963 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Sharon.Lahey@ssa.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 LISA A. HAUN, 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 20 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, CIVIL NO. 2:16-cv-02190-AC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DEFENDANT’S FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SERVE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 21 Defendant. 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Lisa A. Haun (Plaintiff) and Carolyn W. 23 Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant or the Commissioner), by and through 24 their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days to respond 25 to the complaint filed in the above-captioned matter (Docket Number 1) and serve a certified copy of 26 the transcript of the administrative record pursuant to the Court’s September 19, 2016 Procedural Order 27 for Social Security Review Actions (the “scheduling order”) (Docket Number 5). The current deadline 28 is January 3, 2017, and the new deadline will be February 2, 2017. This is the first extension of time STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER 1 (CIVIL NO.. 2:16-cv-02190-AC) 1 requested in the above-captioned matter. Defendant requests this additional time due to an inter-agency 2 delay in finalizing the certified administrative record for service. The parties further agree that the 3 scheduling order be modified accordingly. 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 Dated: December 29, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 6 By: /s/ Cyrus Safa* CYRUS SAFA (*As authorized by email on December 29, 2016) Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 Dated: December 29, 2016 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 11 By: /s/ Sharon Lahey SHARON LAHEY Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing, pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint For Review of the Final Decision of the Social Security and serve a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative record on or before February 2, 2017. Plaintiff shall serve new evidence and/or a confidential settlement letter to Defendant on or before March 6, 2017. Defendant shall serve her response to Plaintiff’s confidential settlement letter on or before April 5, 2017. In the event the parties do not agree to remand, Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment on or before May 10, 2017. Defendant shall file her response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before June 9, 2017. Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before June 29, 2017. DATED: January 4, 2017 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER 2 (CIVIL NO.. 2:16-cv-02190-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?