Keeler v. Sheldon
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/29/2016 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP without prejudice; GRANTING the plaintiff 30 days to renew the IFP application in proper form, or to pay the filing fee; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that a failure to timely renew the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in proper form, or to pay the filing fee, may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIMBERLY J. KEELER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2206 MCE AC (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JOHNATHAN SHELDON,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the
18
undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis
19
(“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2.
20
Plaintiff’s IFP application does not make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
21
According to the application, plaintiff received money from “Disability or workers compensation
22
payments” during the past 12 months. ECF No. 2 at 1 ¶ 3(d). However, plaintiff fails to disclose
23
“the amount received and what you expect you will continue to receive.” See Id. at 1-2.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice to its
26
renewal with all entries on the form completed.
27
2. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to renew the IFP application in
28
proper form, or to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to timely renew the IFP in
1
1
proper form, or to pay the filing fee, may result in a recommendation that this action be
2
dismissed.
3
DATED: September 29, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?