Quick-Panwala v. Lammersville Joint Unified School District et al

Filing 17

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/6/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/20/2018. Discovery due by 2/16/2018. All dispositive motions shall be heard no later than 4/20/2018. Final Pre trial Conference set for 9/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 10/22/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Case Referred to VDRP. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KARMA QUICK-PANWALA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2215 KJM CKD

v.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

LAMMERSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,

ORDER

Defendant.

16
17
18

An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on June 8, 2017. Mary

19
20

Melton appeared for plaintiff; James Ellison, for Stephanie Wu, appeared for defendant.

21

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on May 25, 2017, and

22

discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following

23

orders:

24

I.

SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without

25
26

leave of court, good cause having been shown.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

II.

2

ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without

3

leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth

4

Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

5

III.

6

JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a)(3) & (a)(4).

7

Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed.

8

IV.

9

FACT DISCOVERY SCHEDULE
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall have

10

been completed within fourteen days of the scheduling conference. All discovery shall be

11

completed by February 16, 2018. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall

12

have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to

13

discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has

14

been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the

15

magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned

16

magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact

17

are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned

18

magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set

19

in this order, except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such

20

modification does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.

21

V.

22

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY
The parties do not anticipate the need for extensive electronic discovery. They

23

agree that any electronically stored information may be produced in tangible form in an organized

24

manner on CDs or DVDs in readable format for standard programs for Windows-based operating

25

systems (e.g., Microsoft Windows, Adobe Acrobat, etc.) in its native format. In addition, at the

26

election of a party, with the consent of the other party, not to be unreasonably withheld, and

27

considering the volume of information to be exchanged, the producing party may elect to produce

28

such information by printing the files as documents and Bates numbering the documents. In any
2

1

event, the parties agree to produce information in a manner such that it may be easily retrieved

2

and identified by the receiving party and the court.

3

VI.

4

DISCOVERY PROTECTIVE ORDER
The parties anticipate executing a stipulated protective order related to plaintiff’s

5

medical records and records relating to students, if any are to be exchanged. The parties shall

6

have filed their joint stipulation and discovery protective order within fourteen days of the

7

scheduling conference.

8

VII.

9

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other

10

parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial

11

not later than February 16, 2018. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report

12

prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).

13

By March 2, 2018, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a

14

supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an

15

expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation

16

has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation

17

shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated

18

above.

19

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all

20

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert

21

witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering

22

the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably

23

anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were

24

promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made

25

available for deposition.

26

For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used

27

at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which

28

include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
3

1

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the

2

case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert

3

for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,

4

retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the

5

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state

6

in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.

7

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render

8

an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and

9

complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted

10

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition

11

taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by March 20, 2018.

12

VIII.

13

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining

14

orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than April 20, 2018.1 The parties

15

may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s website.

16
17

All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:

18

(a)

The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and

19

(b)

When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the

20

opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.

21

Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to

22

the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,

23

652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).

24

The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are

25

encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral

26

argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school

27
28

1

Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4

1

will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s

2

schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it

3

appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.

4

The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty

5

(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases

6

must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.

7

Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,

8

counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the

9

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate

10

the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party

11

considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel

12

should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for

13

summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution

14

by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during

15

the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the

16

motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and

17

confer efforts.

18

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could

19

have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off

20

date may constitute waiver of such issue.

21

IX.

22

SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the

23

prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the

24

record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be

25

directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be

26

governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the

27

discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the

28

public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
5

1

sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has

2

identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the

3

opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of

4

sealing or redaction from the court.

5

X.

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

6

The Final Pretrial Conference is set for September 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. At least

7

one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial

8

Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to

9

attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the

10

case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.

11

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final

12

Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of

13

witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference

14

statement by August 17, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the

15

matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local

16

Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:

17
18

- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.

19

- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.

20

Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to

21

identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of

22

each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.

23

Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core

24

disputed facts in the above manner.

25

- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s

26

motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be

27

necessary before the first day of trial.

28

/////
6

1

- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory

2

underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core

3

undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the

4

parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.

5

- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the

6

jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to

7

inform the jury what the case is about.

8

- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.

9

Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include

10
11

documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to

12

attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they

13

propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief

14

statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each

15

party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial

16

Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to

17

the Final Pretrial Order.

18

Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed

19

alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for

20

plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be

21

marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be

22

then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened

23

together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include

24

excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and

25

defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation

26

the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that

27

all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a

28

number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent
7

1

possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-

2

1, JX-2.

3

The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of

4

witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the

5

standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a

6

party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

7
8

Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.

9
10

Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.

11

The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of

12

Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the

13

formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)

14

the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof

15

and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference

16

Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2

17

A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary

18

sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as

19

the court deems appropriate.

20

Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,

21

counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety

22

(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: [e-mail].

23

XI.

24

MOTIONS IN LIMINE
All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement.

25

In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of

26

2

27
28

“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
8

1

trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their

2

final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final

3

pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in

4

limine as necessary.

5

The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device

6

designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon

7

dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions

8

in limine.

9

XII.

10

TRIAL SETTING
The jury trial is set for October 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial

11

length of approximately three (3) to five (5) days. Trial briefs are due by October 8, 2018.

12

XIII.

13

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The parties have expressed interest in a settlement conference and are amenable to

14

a settlement conference convened by a member of the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel

15

(VDRP). Accordingly, this matter is referred to the court’s ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for

16

referral to VDRP, for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in late September 2017. A

17

principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear at the VDRP session.

18

In the event no VDRP panelist is available during the time frame set forth above, the case will be

19

referred to another judge of this court for settlement. The parties are reminded to promptly notify

20

the court if they settle this case prior to the scheduled VDRP conference date.

21

XIV. MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

22

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

23

Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court

24

upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute

25

good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does

26

not constitute good cause.

27

/////

28

/////
9

1

As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery

2

dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the

3

schedule of the case.

4

XIV. OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

5
6
7
8

This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 6, 2017.

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10