Clinton, Jr. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III on 6/12/2017 DISMISSING CASE in its entirety with prejudice, Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11

LEWIS CLINTON, JR.,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:16-cv-02228-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.;
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
CORPORATION; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

2:16-CV-02228-WHO

1

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

2

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

3

stipulated by and between Plaintiff Lewis Clinton, Jr. and Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing,

4

Inc., National Default Servicing Corporation (collectively the “Parties”), each acting through their

5

undersigned attorneys of record in this action, that this action is to be dismissed in its entirety

6

with prejudice, and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

7
8

Dated: June 9, 2017

THE WYATT LAW CORPORATION

9
By:
/s/ Russell A. Wyatt (as authorized
on 6/9/17)
RUSSELL A. WYATT
Attorney for Plaintiff
LEWIS CLINTON, JR.

10
11
12
13
14

Dated: June 9, 2017

STOEL RIVES LLP

15
By:

16
17
18
19

/s/ Thomas A. Woods
THOMAS A. WOODS
TIFFANIE C. DE LA RIVA
Attorneys for Defendants
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.;
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
CORPORATION

20
21

ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE:
I attest under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I have

22
23

received the concurrence in the filing of this document from the listed signatories as required by

24

law.

25

Dated: June 9, 2017
/s/ Thomas A. Woods
THOMAS A. WOODS

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

-1-

2:16-CV-02228-WHO

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

After consideration of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, is

3
4

dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

5
6

Dated: June 12, 2017_______________

7

_____________________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick, III
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

-2-

2:16-CV-02228-WHO