Spies et al v. El Dorado County et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION and ORDER 72 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/13/2017 dismissing with prejudice defendant Alexis F. Lieser. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ STEWART KATZ, State Bar #127425 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: (916) 444-5678 Facsimile: (916) 444-3364 Attorney for Plaintiffs LAWRENCE SPIES, SR., and LINDA SPIES, Individually and as Successors in Interest of LAWRENCE SPIES, JR. (deceased) KROLOFF, BELCHER, SMART, PERRY & CHRISTOPHERSON A Professional Law Corporation Thomas O. Perry, SBN 49699 Allison Cherry Lafferty, SBN 204252 7540 Shoreline Drive Stockton, CA 95219 Phone: (209) 478-2000 Facsimile: (209) 478-0354 Email: tperry@kroloff.com alafferty@kroloff.com Attorneys for Defendants JOHN J. SKRATT, M.D. and ALEXIS F. LIESER, M.D. 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 LAWRENCE SPIES, SR., and LINDA SPIES, Individually and as Successors in Interest of LAWRENCE SPIES, JR. (deceased); 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ALEXIS F. LIESER, M.D. vs. 19 NO. 2:16-cv-02232-WBS-GGH EL DORADO COUNTY; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER; JOHN D’AGOSTINI; RANDY PESHON;MATT FOXWORTHY; JACKIE NOREN: ROBIN HOPE; RAYMOND HERR,M.D.; LISA ISSACSON; TAYLOR FITHIAN,M.D.; MARK HANGEBRAUCK; JOHN J. SKRATT, M.D.; ALEXIS F. LIESER, M.D.; DOES 1-50 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Defendants. ______________________________/ 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Dismissal 1 1 Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS 2 HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action against Defendant ALEXIS F. 3 LIESER, M.D. is dismissed with prejudice. Each side is to bear its/their own attorneys’ fees 4 and costs. 5 6 Dated: December 13, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Dismissal 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?