Aranda v. American Pasteurization Company, LLC
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/21/2017 ORDERING that the expert witness disclosure deadlines are CONTINUED as follows: Initial expert disclosure due 12/22/2017; Rebuttal expert disclosure due 1/22/2018; Expert discovery cut-off is 2/19/2018. (Zignago, K.)
1
4
LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN
Linh T. Nguyen (SBN 198751)
linh@nguyenatlaw.com
8841 Williamson Drive, Suite 80
Elk Grove, California 95624-1800
Telephone: (916) 686-6600
Facsimile: (916) 550-9509
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE ARANDA
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Nick C. Geannacopulos (SBN 114822)
ngeannacopulos@seyfarth.com
Ari Hersher (SBN 260321)
ahersher@seyfarth.com
Pamela L. Vartabedian (SBN 251133)
pvartabedian@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Facsimile:
(415) 397-8549
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
JOSE ARANDA,
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
vs.
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY,
LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02242-WBS-AC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
Complaint filed: February 18, 2016
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
37050877v.1
1
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules 240 and 270, and the
2
Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order, Plaintiff Jose Aranda and Defendant American Pasteurization
3
Company (“Defendant” or “APC”) (collectively the “Parties”) hereby submit this Stipulation and
4
[Proposed] Order to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order. The Parties request that the Court modify
5
the Pretrial Scheduling Order and continue the expert witness disclosure dates by five (5) months as set
6
forth below.
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION,
through their counsel of record, as follows:
1.
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2017, this Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (the
“Scheduling Order”) in this matter.
2.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, the deadline for expert witness
disclosures is July 28, 2017, and the deadline for rebuttal expert witness disclosures is August 31, 2017.
13
3.
WHEREAS, the Parties’ deadline to file and serve motions is November 20, 2017.
14
4.
WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate mediating this case in the summer of 2017, and agree
15
16
that mediation may resolve some or all of the claims at issue in this case.
5.
WHEREAS, if mediation is unsuccessful in resolving the case in its entirety, Defendant
17
intends to file a dispositive motion on or before the November 20, 2017 deadline, which may dispose of
18
the case or narrow the issues to be addressed at trial.
19
6.
WHEREAS, both parties wish to avoid the incurrence of expert witness fees and costs (or
20
rebuttal witness fees and costs), as well as associated written discovery, depositions, and meet and
21
confer efforts, if some or all of the case may be disposed of via settlement or other means.
22
7.
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and now agree that it is in the best
23
interest of economic and judicial efficiency to continue the expert witness disclosure dates by five (5)
24
months, until after mediation can be completed and summary judgment can be decided.
25
8.
WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that good cause exists to continue the expert
26
witness disclosure deadlines, as a continuance is needed to prevent the expenditure of time and resources
27
on experts that may not be needed for trial.
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
37050877v.1
1
2
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the Court may enter an Order
continuing the July 28, 2017 and August 31, 2017 expert witness disclosure deadlines as follows:
3
Initial expert disclosure:
December 22, 2017
4
Rebuttal expert disclosure:
January 22, 2018
5
Expert discovery cut-off:
February 19, 2018
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
7
8
DATED: February 16, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN
9
By: /s/ Linh T. Nguyen [as authorized on 2/16/2017]
Linh T. Nguyen
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE ARANDA
12
13
DATED: February 16, 2017
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
14
By:
15
16
17
/s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian
Nick C. Geannacopulos
Ari Hersher
Pamela L. Vartabedian
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY,
LLC
18
19
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 131
20
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 131, I, Pamela Vartabedian, hereby attest that the content of this
22
document is acceptable to Linh T. Nguyen, Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Aranda, and that I have obtained
23
Mr. Nguyen’s authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.
24
Executed this 16th day of February 2017 in San Francisco, CA.
/s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian________________
Pamela L. Vartabedian
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
37050877v.1
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The expert witness disclosure deadlines will be continued as follows:
3
Initial expert disclosure:
December 22, 2017
4
Rebuttal expert disclosure:
January 22, 2018
5
Expert discovery cut-off:
February 19, 2018
6
7
Dated: February 21, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
37050877v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?