Aranda v. American Pasteurization Company, LLC

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/27/2017 ORDERING all parties to disclose expert witnesses by 12/11/2017 and to disclose rebuttal experts by 1/2/2018; ORDERING that expert discovery be completed by 1/19/2018. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 4 LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN Linh T. Nguyen (SBN 198751) linh@nguyenatlaw.com 8841 Williamson Drive, Suite 80 Elk Grove, California 95624-1800 Telephone: (916) 686-6600 Facsimile: (916) 550-9509 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE ARANDA 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Nick C. Geannacopulos (SBN 114822) ngeannacopulos@seyfarth.com Ari Hersher (SBN 260321) ahersher@seyfarth.com Pamela L. Vartabedian (SBN 251133) pvartabedian@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JOSE ARANDA, 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-02242-WBS-AC AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Complaint filed: February 18, 2016 25 26 27 28 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC 37540930v.1 1 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules 240 and 270, and the 2 Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order, Plaintiff Jose Aranda and Defendant American Pasteurization 3 Company (“Defendant” or “APC”) (collectively the “Parties”) hereby submit this Amended Stipulation 4 and [Proposed] Order to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order. The Parties request that the Court 5 modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order and continue the expert witness disclosure dates by approximately 6 five (5) months as set forth below. 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, through their counsel of record, as follows: 1. WHEREAS, on January 24, 2017, this Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (the “Scheduling Order”) in this matter. 2. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, the deadline for expert witness disclosures is July 28, 2017, and the deadline for rebuttal expert witness disclosures is August 31, 2017. 13 3. WHEREAS, the Parties’ deadline to file and serve motions is November 20, 2017. 14 4. WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate mediating this case in the summer of 2017, and agree 15 16 that mediation may resolve some or all of the claims at issue in this case. 5. WHEREAS, if mediation is unsuccessful in resolving the case in its entirety, Defendant 17 intends to file a dispositive motion on or before the November 20, 2017 deadline, which may dispose of 18 the case or narrow the issues to be addressed at trial. 19 6. WHEREAS, both parties wish to avoid the incurrence of expert witness fees and costs (or 20 rebuttal witness fees and costs), as well as associated written discovery, depositions, and meet and 21 confer efforts, if some or all of the case may be disposed of via settlement or other means. 22 7. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and now agree that it is in the best 23 interest of economic and judicial efficiency to continue the expert witness disclosure dates by 24 approximately five (5) months, until after mediation can be completed and summary judgment can be 25 decided. 26 8. WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that good cause exists to continue the expert 27 witness disclosure deadlines, as a continuance is needed to prevent the expenditure of time and resources 28 on experts that may not be needed for trial. 2 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC 37540930v.1 1 2 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the Court may enter an Order continuing the July 28, 2017 and August 31, 2017 expert witness disclosure deadlines as follows: 3 Initial expert disclosure: December 11, 2017 4 Rebuttal expert disclosure: January 2, 2018 5 Expert discovery cut-off: January 19, 2018 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 7 8 DATED: February 24, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN 9 By: /s/ Linh T. Nguyen [as authorized on 2/24/2017] Linh T. Nguyen 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE ARANDA 12 13 DATED: February 27, 2017 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 14 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian Nick C. Geannacopulos Ari Hersher Pamela L. Vartabedian Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC 19 20 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 131 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 131, I, Pamela Vartabedian, hereby attest that the content of this 22 document is acceptable to Linh T. Nguyen, Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Aranda, and that I have obtained 23 Mr. Nguyen’s authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document. 24 Executed this 27th day of February 2017 in San Francisco, CA. 25 /s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian________________ Pamela L. Vartabedian 26 27 28 3 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC 37540930v.1 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The expert witness disclosure deadlines will be continued as follows: 3 Initial expert disclosure: December 11, 2017 4 Rebuttal expert disclosure: January 2, 2018 5 Expert discovery cut-off: January 19, 2018 6 7 Dated: February 27, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC 37540930v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?