Aranda v. American Pasteurization Company, LLC
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/15/2107 DISMISSING the plaintiff's Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action pursuant to the 8 Stipulation for Dismissal. (Michel, G.)
1
4
LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN
Linh T. Nguyen (SBN 198751)
linh@nguyenatlaw.com
8841 Williamson Drive, Suite 80
Elk Grove, California 95624-1800
Telephone: (916) 686-6600
Facsimile: (916) 550-9509
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSE ARANDA
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Nick C. Geannacopulos (SBN 114822)
ngeannacopulos@seyfarth.com
Ari Hersher (SBN 260321)
ahersher@seyfarth.com
Pamela L. Vartabedian (SBN 251133)
pvartabedian@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Facsimile:
(415) 397-8549
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
JOSE ARANDA,
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
vs.
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY,
LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-02242-WBS-AC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
FOURTH AND FIFTH CAUSES OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed: February 18, 2016
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS FROM PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
36290004v.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff Jose Aranda (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant American Pasteurization Company, LLC
(“APC”) (collectively “the Parties”) by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate and agree
as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on February 18, 2016, alleging five causes of action
for: (1) Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; (2) Retaliation in Violation of Labor Code
§ 6310; (3) Retaliation in Violation of Labor Code § 1102.5; (4) Failure to Provide Records in Violation
of Labor Code § 1198.5; and (5) Failure to Provide Records in Violation of Labor Code § 226.
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2016, the action was removed to the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California and was assigned Case No. 2:16-cv-02242-WBS-AC.
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Plaintiff shall dismiss with prejudice his Fourth and Fifth
Causes of Action for: (1) Failure to Provide Records in Violation of Labor Code § 1198.5; and (2)
Failure to Provide Records in Violation of Labor Code § 226. Each party shall bear its own fees and
costs in connection with these claims.
14
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
17
DATED: February 14, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF LINH T. NGUYEN
18
19
By: /s/ Linh T. Nguyen [as authorized on 2/8/2017]
Linh T. Nguyen
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE ARANDA
21
22
23
DATED: February 14, 2017
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian
Nick C. Geannacopulos
Ari Hersher
Pamela L. Vartabedian
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN PASTEURIZATION COMPANY, LLC
28
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS FROM PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
36290004v.1
1
2
3
4
5
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 131
Pursuant to Local Rule 131, I, Pamela Vartabedian, hereby attest that the content of this
document is acceptable to Linh T. Nguyen, Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Aranda, and that I have obtained
Mr. Nguyen’s authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.
Executed this 14th day of February 2017 in San Francisco, CA.
6
/s/ Pamela L. Vartabedian________________
Pamela L. Vartabedian
7
8
ORDER
9
10
11
12
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, the Court dismisses the
above-referenced claims in accordance with the Parties’ stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2017
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS FROM PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02242-WBS-AC
36290004v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?