California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Sun Gro Horticulture Processing
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III, on 1/31/2017 ORDERING that the Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2017, is RESCHEDULED for 4/25/2017. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by 4/18/2017. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893)
Richard T. Drury (State Bar No. 163559)
Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382)
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Tel: (510) 836-4200
Fax: (510) 836-4205 (fax)
E-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com
doug@lozeaudrury.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:16-cv-02247-WHO
THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit
corporation,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
vs.
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
SUN GRO HORTICULTURE PROCESSING,
a Delaware corporation,
Case Management Conference: February 7,
2017
Time: 3:00 PM
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, on September 22, 2016, Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection
Alliance filed a complaint against Defendant Sun Gro Horticulture Processing;
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2016, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant;
WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on February 21, 2017;
WHEREAS, since early August 2016, the Parties have been diligently engaging in
confidential settlement discussions that would resolve this matter outside of litigation. These
discussions included a confidential settlement meeting at Defendant’s facility that is the subject of
this action. The Parties are presently negotiating a draft settlement agreement that would resolve all
of the claims alleged in the Complaint;
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2:16-cv-02247-WHO
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2017, at 3:00 p.m., the Parties are scheduled to appear before
1
2
Judge Orrick for a Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, the Parties believes that rescheduling the case management conference will
3
4
conserve court resources and allow the Parties to focus on their settlement discussions;
5
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the Case
6
Management Conference for April 25, 2017, to provide an opportunity for the Parties to reach a
7
settlement agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously sought a continuance of the Case Management
8
9
Conference, and no Parties would be prejudiced by the proposed continuance;
THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective
10
11
counsel, as follows:
1.
12
25, 2017.
13
2.
14
The deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement be rescheduled for April
18, 2017.
15
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the Court to approve and enter the Order
16
17
The Case Management Conference set for February 7, 2017, be rescheduled for April
below.
18
19
Dated: January 30, 2017
By: _/s/ Douglas J. Chermak______________
Douglas J. Chermak
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE
Dated: January 30, 2017
By: _/s/ Sarah P. Sandford (authorized on 1/30/2017)
Sara P. Sandford
Attorneys for Defendant
SUN GRO HORTICULTURE PROCESSING
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
2:16-cv-02247-WHO
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that
3
the Case Management Conference set for February 7, 2017, is rescheduled for April 25, 2017. The
4
parties shall file a joint case management statement by April 18, 2017.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Dated: _January 31, 2017____
11
12
13
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
3
2:16-cv-02247-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?