California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Sun Gro Horticulture Processing

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III, on 1/31/2017 ORDERING that the Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2017, is RESCHEDULED for 4/25/2017. The parties shall file a joint case management statement by 4/18/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893) Richard T. Drury (State Bar No. 163559) Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382) LOZEAU DRURY LLP 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Tel: (510) 836-4200 Fax: (510) 836-4205 (fax) E-mail: michael@lozeaudrury.com doug@lozeaudrury.com Attorneys for Plaintiff THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:16-cv-02247-WHO THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, vs. Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick SUN GRO HORTICULTURE PROCESSING, a Delaware corporation, Case Management Conference: February 7, 2017 Time: 3:00 PM Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, on September 22, 2016, Plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance filed a complaint against Defendant Sun Gro Horticulture Processing; WHEREAS, on December 20, 2016, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant; WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on February 21, 2017; WHEREAS, since early August 2016, the Parties have been diligently engaging in confidential settlement discussions that would resolve this matter outside of litigation. These discussions included a confidential settlement meeting at Defendant’s facility that is the subject of this action. The Parties are presently negotiating a draft settlement agreement that would resolve all of the claims alleged in the Complaint; 28 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2:16-cv-02247-WHO WHEREAS, on February 7, 2017, at 3:00 p.m., the Parties are scheduled to appear before 1 2 Judge Orrick for a Case Management Conference; WHEREAS, the Parties believes that rescheduling the case management conference will 3 4 conserve court resources and allow the Parties to focus on their settlement discussions; 5 WHEREAS, the Parties agreed, upon the Court’s approval, to reschedule the Case 6 Management Conference for April 25, 2017, to provide an opportunity for the Parties to reach a 7 settlement agreement; WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously sought a continuance of the Case Management 8 9 Conference, and no Parties would be prejudiced by the proposed continuance; THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective 10 11 counsel, as follows: 1. 12 25, 2017. 13 2. 14 The deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement be rescheduled for April 18, 2017. 15 WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the Court to approve and enter the Order 16 17 The Case Management Conference set for February 7, 2017, be rescheduled for April below. 18 19 Dated: January 30, 2017 By: _/s/ Douglas J. Chermak______________ Douglas J. Chermak Attorneys for Plaintiff THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE Dated: January 30, 2017 By: _/s/ Sarah P. Sandford (authorized on 1/30/2017) Sara P. Sandford Attorneys for Defendant SUN GRO HORTICULTURE PROCESSING 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 2:16-cv-02247-WHO [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 3 the Case Management Conference set for February 7, 2017, is rescheduled for April 25, 2017. The 4 parties shall file a joint case management statement by April 18, 2017. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Dated: _January 31, 2017____ 11 12 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 2:16-cv-02247-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?