MD Helicopters v. Aerometals, Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/16/18 GRANTING 85 Request to Seal. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL Robert S. Metzger (State Bar No. 81294) Merri A. Baldwin (State Bar No. 141957) Josh M. Deitz (State Bar No. 267454) 311 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.956.2828 Facsimile: 415.956.6457 rmetzger@rjo.com mbaldwin@rjo.com jdeitz@rjo.com Attorneys for Defendant AEROMETALS, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MD HELICOPTERS, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:16-cv-02249-TLN-AC ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT AEROMETALS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO MD HELICOPTERS, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND vs. AEROMETALS, INC., Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Defendant Aerometals, Inc.’s Request for an Order to File Under Seal Documents in 21 Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Amend 22 pursuant to Local Rule 141 is GRANTED. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file under seal an unredacted version 24 of its Opposition to the Motion for Leave to Amend filed by Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc. 25 pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order on file herein (ECF Nos. 32, 33, and 34). 26 Defendant shall also file under seal Exhibits A through G to the Declaration of Robert S. 27 Metzger filed in support of Defendant’s Opposition. These documents shall remain sealed 28 during the duration of this litigation pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order 1 1 unless the confidentiality designations are withdrawn or ordered removed. The documents 2 may be disclosed to the Court and its personnel per the terms of the Protective Order (ECF 3 No. 33 at 7.3(d)). 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 16, 2018 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?