MD Helicopters v. Aerometals, Inc.
Filing
89
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/16/18 GRANTING 85 Request to Seal. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL
Robert S. Metzger (State Bar No. 81294)
Merri A. Baldwin (State Bar No. 141957)
Josh M. Deitz (State Bar No. 267454)
311 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415.956.2828
Facsimile: 415.956.6457
rmetzger@rjo.com
mbaldwin@rjo.com
jdeitz@rjo.com
Attorneys for Defendant
AEROMETALS, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
MD HELICOPTERS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:16-cv-02249-TLN-AC
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
AN ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL
DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT AEROMETALS, INC.’S
OPPOSITION TO MD HELICOPTERS,
INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
AMEND
vs.
AEROMETALS, INC.,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
Defendant Aerometals, Inc.’s Request for an Order to File Under Seal Documents in
21
Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Amend
22
pursuant to Local Rule 141 is GRANTED.
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file under seal an unredacted version
24
of its Opposition to the Motion for Leave to Amend filed by Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc.
25
pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order on file herein (ECF Nos. 32, 33, and 34).
26
Defendant shall also file under seal Exhibits A through G to the Declaration of Robert S.
27
Metzger filed in support of Defendant’s Opposition. These documents shall remain sealed
28
during the duration of this litigation pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order
1
1
unless the confidentiality designations are withdrawn or ordered removed. The documents
2
may be disclosed to the Court and its personnel per the terms of the Protective Order (ECF
3
No. 33 at 7.3(d)).
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: April 16, 2018
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?