Moore v. Tesluk et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/4/2017 ADOPTING in FULL 33 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's claim pursuant to California Government Code § 845.6. Defendant Tesluk is ORDERED to file a response to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim within twenty days of the date of this order. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN MOORE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2268 GEB KJN P
v.
ORDER
G. TESLUK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 13, 2017, are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendant Tesluk’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim pursuant to California
4
5
Government Code § 845.6 (ECF No. 18) is granted; and
3. Defendant Tesluk is ordered to file a response to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim
6
within twenty days of the date of this order.
7
Dated: August 4, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?