Moore v. Tesluk et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/2018 ORDERING within 14 days of the date of this order, defendant Fox to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN MOORE,

12
13
14

No. 2: 16-cv-2268 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

G. TESLUK, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to compel addressed to

19

defendants Tesluk, Nguyen and Fox. (ECF No. 68.) Defendants Tesluk and Nguyen filed

20

oppositions to the motion to compel. (ECF Nos. 69, 71.) Defendant Fox did not respond to the

21

motion to compel.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this

23

order, defendant Fox shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to

24

respond to plaintiff’s motion to compel.

25

Dated: February 22, 2018

26
Mo2268.osc(2)
27
28
1