Demarest v. The City of Vallejo California et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/29/2017 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations; DISMISSING Defendants Joseph Kreins, Andrew Bidou from this action without leave to amend. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID P. DEMAREST,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2271 GEB KJN PS
ORDER

v.
THE CITY OF VALLEJO CALIFORNIA,
et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On February 17, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

18
19

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

20

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) No objections were

21

filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

22
23

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

24

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

25

1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

26
27

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

2

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 17, 2017 (ECF No. 12),

3

are ADOPTED;

4

2. Defendants Joseph Kreins and Andrew Bidou are dismissed from this action without

5

leave to amend.

6

Dated: March 29, 2017

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2