Williams v. Rackley

Filing 14

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/14/2017 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 21 days, why respondent's motion to dismiss should not be granted.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNNIE F. WILLIAMS, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2288 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RONALD RACKLEY, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent consented to proceed before the undersigned 19 for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On March 7, 2017, respondent filed a motion to 20 dismiss this action on the grounds that it was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations. 21 Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure 22 of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be 23 deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Good cause appearing, IT 24 IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty-one days, why respondent’s 25 motion to dismiss should not be granted. 26 Dated: April 14, 2017 27 28 /will2288.46h 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?