Howard v. DJI Technology, Inc.

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi on 11/28/2016 ORDERING that this Court elects to decide the 9 Motion to Dismiss without a hearing, pursuant to L.R. 230 (g). The deadline for any party to file an opposition to the Motion is 12/14/2016. The deadline for DJI's optional reply in support of the Motion is 12/21/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
MINUTES CASE NUMBER: 2:16-cv-02292-LEK (USDC, Eastern District of California) CASE NAME: Tyson Howard vs. DJI Technology, Inc., also known as DJI Technology Co., LTD ATTYS FOR PLA: ATTYS FOR DEFT: INTERPRETER: JUDGE: Leslie E. Kobayashi REPORTER: DATE: 11/28/2016 TIME: COURT ACTION: EO: COURT ORDER ELECTING TO DECIDE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT A HEARING On November 22, 2016, Defendant DJI Technology, Inc. (“DJI”) filed its Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). [Dkt. no. 9.] This Court elects to decide the Motion without a hearing, pursuant to L.R. 230(g) (stating that a motion “may be submitted upon the record and briefs on file . . . if the Court so orders, subject to the power of the Court to reopen the matter for further briefs or oral arguments or both”). The deadline for any party to file an opposition to the Motion is December 14, 2016. The deadline for DJI’s optional reply in support of the Motion is December 21, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Submitted by: Warren N. Nakamura, Courtroom Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?