Herrera v. Idemudia

Filing 39

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/02/17 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for extension of time 36 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to amend 37 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO HERRERA, 12 No. 2:16-cv-2293 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 M. IDEMUDIA, 15 ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff filed this pro se prisoner action on September 26, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On 18 November 9, 2016, the undersigned determined that service was appropriate for defendant 19 Idemudia and directed the clerk to send plaintiff service documents, to be completed within thirty 20 days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was granted three extensions of time to submit service documents 21 and informed that no further extensions would be granted. (ECF No. 28; see ECF Nos. 26 & 35.) To date, however, plaintiff has not submitted service documents for defendant Idemudia. 22 23 Rather, he seeks a fourth extension of time and also moves to amend the complaint. (ECF Nos. 24 36 & 37.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be 25 given freely when justice requires. Here, plaintiff does not attach a proposed amended complaint 26 as required by Local Rule 137(c). In the absence of any reviewable pleading, the court does not 27 find that justice requires leave to amend in this instance. 28 //// 1 1 Moreover, plaintiff has not shown good cause for additional time to submit service 2 documents. As he has failed to do so despite multiple extensions of time, the undersigned will 3 recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 36) is denied; and 6 2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 37) is denied. 7 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 8 9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 10 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 11 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 12 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 13 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 14 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 15 Cir. 1991). 16 Dated: May 2, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2/herr2293.fusm 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?