Johnson v. Yaghoubian et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/28/17 ORDERING that Within fourteen (14) days of this order, defendants Camp and Ahmed shall pay the Clerk of Court $650.00 in sanctions based on their failure to comply with the court's prior orders. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in defendants' answer being stricken and default judgment entered against them. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-02299-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER YAGHOUBIAN, et. al, Defendant. 16 17 On June 8, 2017, this court ordered defendants Camp and Ahmed to show cause in 18 writing, no later than June 21, 2017, why the court should not (1) impose monetary sanctions in 19 the amount of $650.00 based upon their failure to serve responses to discovery propounded by 20 plaintiff on time, and (2) impose further sanctions against defendants based upon their failure to 21 follow court orders and their repeated failure to appear. (ECF No. 39.) 22 Defendants have failed to respond. Moreover, since filing their answer on December 16, 23 2016, (ECF No. 20), defendants have been wholly unresponsive to plaintiff and the court. 24 Therefore, the court finds that sanctions are appropriate at this juncture. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, defendants Camp and Ahmed shall pay the 27 Clerk of Court $650.00 in sanctions based on their failure to comply with the court’s 28 prior orders. 1 1 2 3 4 2. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in defendants’ answer being stricken and default judgment entered against them. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 14/16-2299.Johnson v. Yaghoubian.order sanctions 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?