Cleveland v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Filing
123
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/2/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 122 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 121 Motion for Reconsideration. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOMINGO L. CLEVELAND, SR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-02308 MCE AC
v.
ORDER
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
17
18
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On July 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
19
20
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one. Neither party has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2020, (ECF No. 122) are ADOPTED
26
in full; and
27
28
///
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 121) is DENIED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: September 2, 2020
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?