Johnson v. Navient Solutions, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/9/17 ORDERING that the discovery cut-off deadline is CONTINUED to 7/24/2017. The dispositive motion deadline is CONTINUED to 9/5/2017. The hearing on the dispositive motions is CONTINUED to 10/3/20 17 at 1:30 p.m. The joint pre-trial statement deadline is CONTINUED to 11/10/2017. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 11/17/2017 at 11:00 AM and the Trial is CONTINUED to 1/22/2018 at 09:00 AM, to be heard in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO SHERRI JOHNSON, Case No. 2:16-cv-02327-JAM-AC Plaintiff, Assigned to Hon. John A. Mendez, Ctrm. 6 v. ORDER GRANTING AMENDED STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT) NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Complaint Filed: September 29, 2016 Trial Date: October 30, 2017 THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Amended Stipulation by and between Plaintiff Sherri Johnson and Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc. to amend the status and pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 10). GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the court approves the Amended Stipulation and orders as follows: 1. The discovery cut-off deadline is continued to July 24, 2017; 2. The dispositive motion deadline is continued to September 5, 2017; {41928073;1} 1 PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02327-JAM-AC 3. The hearing on the dispositive motions is continued to October 3, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. 4. The joint pre-trial statement deadline is continued to November 10, 2017; 5. The final pre-trial conference is continued to November 17, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.; and 6. Trial is continued to January 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/9/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez_______ Hon. John A. Mendez {41928073;1} 2 PROOF OF SERVICE CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02327-JAM-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?