Phan v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/28/17: Request for entry of the proposed stipulated protective order 43 is denied without prejudice to renewal. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

XUAN THI PHAN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2328 WBS DB

v.

ORDER

JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a
Delaware Corporation,

16

Defendant.

17
18

On November 20, 2017, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order regarding

19

the use of confidential information. (ECF No. 43.) On November 22, 2017, the parties provided

20

the undersigned with a proposed order granting the stipulated protective order.
Review of the parties’ proposed stipulated protective order finds that it contemplates that

21
22

the parties’ conduct will conform to “Local Rule 37.1 et seq.,” and “Local Civil Rule 79-5.”

23

(Prop. Stip. Prot. Ord (ECF No. 43) at 3, 8.) This court, however, has neither a Local Rule 37.1

24

nor a Local Civil Rule 79-5.

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ November 20, 2017 request for entry of

2

the proposed stipulated protective order (ECF No. 43) is denied without prejudice to renewal.

3

Dated: November 28, 2017

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\phan2328.stip.protord.den

23
24
25
26
27
28
2