Bobo v. Fresno County Dependency Court

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/26/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES LEWIS BOBO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. No. 2:16-cv-2339 TLN DB PS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FRESNO COUNTY DEPENDCY COURT AND TRUST FUND, Defendant. 17 18 By order filed August 17, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was 19 granted leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days from 20 the date of that order to file an amended complaint. The thirty-day period has expired, and 21 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 22 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 27 objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to 28 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 1 1 objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal 2 the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: September 26, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.pro se/bobo2339.fta.f&rs 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?