Langston v. Tyler

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff one USM-284 form; and within 30 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the court the corr ected USM-285 form, a completed summons, and two copies of his original endorsed complaint filed October 3, 2016 (ECF No. 1 ). Failure to return the required documents within the specified time period will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WALTER SHANE LANGSTON, 12 No. 2:16-cv-2358 GEB AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TYLER, Correctional Officer, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. ยง 1983. By order filed December 2, 2016, this court directed plaintiff to complete and return to the 19 20 court, within thirty days, a summons, a USM-285 form and two copies of his complaint, all 21 required to effect service of process on defendant Tyler. On December 12, 2016, plaintiff 22 requested a new blank USM-285 form. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff one USM-284 form; and 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2. Within thirty days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the court 2 the corrected USM-285 form, a completed summons, and two copies of his original endorsed 3 complaint filed October 3, 2016 (ECF No. 1). Failure to return the required documents within the 4 specified time period will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without 5 prejudice. 6 DATED: December 28, 2016 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?