Langston v. Roesser

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/06/17 denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel and granting 12 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 WALTER SHANE LANGSTON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:16-cv-2362 MCE CKD P v. ORDER ROESSER, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has 17 ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 18 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional 19 circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 21 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required 22 exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be 23 denied. 24 25 Plaintiff has also requested an extension of time to file a second amended complaint. Good cause appearing, the request will be granted. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 12) is denied; 28 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 12) is granted; and 1 1 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a second 2 amended complaint. 3 Dated: March 6, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2/kly lang2362.31+36 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?