Mayberry v. Suisun City Police Department et al.

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/18/17 ORDERING that Defendant Suisun City Police Department is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Benson, A)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

MICHAEL BRANDON MAYBERRY,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9

No. 2:16-cv-2371-JAM-KJN (PS)
ORDER

v.
SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPT.,

10

Defendant.

11
12

On December 15, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

13

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

14

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

15
16

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

17

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

18

1983).

19
20

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

21

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

22

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2016, are

23
24

ADOPTED;
2. Defendant Suisun City Police Department is dismissed from this action with prejudice.

25
26

DATED: January 18, 2017

27

/s/John A. Mendez_________________________

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1