Stine v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/2/16, ORDERING that Samsung's deadline to response to Stine's complaint is STAYED pending further order of the Court. The time for Samsung to response to the complaint by ans wer or Rule 12 motion is EXTENDED and CONTINUED until 30 days following entry of an order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Stine's Motion for Transfer of Related Actions to the Central District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings. This stay of Samsung's deadline to respond to the complaint is entered without prejudice to either party's ability to later petition the Court to lift the stay. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5

ANDREW J. FRACKMAN (pro hac forthcoming)
AMY LAURENDEAU (S.B. #198321)
CARLOS M. LAZATIN (pro hac forthcoming)
HANNAH Y. CHANOINE (pro hac forthcoming)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Times Square Tower
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036-6524
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO

12
13

MARLETTA STINE, on behalf of herself and
those similarly situated,

14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
STAYING SAMSUNG’S RESPONSE
DEADLINE PENDING MDL MOTION

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC.,
Defendant.

19
20

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation Staying Samsung’s

21

Response Deadline Pending MDL Motion. The Court has reviewed the evidence in question and,

22

good cause appearing, GRANTS the parties’ stipulation.

23
24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Samsung’s deadline to response to Stine’s complaint is

25

stayed pending further order of the Court. The time for Samsung to response to the complaint by

26

answer or Rule 12 motion is hereby extended and continued until 30 days following entry of an

27

order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Stine’s Motion for Transfer of Related

28
ORDER GRANTING STIP. STAYING
RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING MDL
MOTION, 2:16-CV-02397-MCE-EFB

1

Actions to the Central District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for Consolidated

2

Pretrial Proceedings. This stay of Samsung’s deadline to respond to the complaint is entered

3

without prejudice to either party’s ability to later petition the Court to lift the stay.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 2, 2016

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

ORDER GRANTING STIP. STAYING
RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING MDL
MOTION, 2:16-CV-02397-MCE-EFB