Stine v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2017 ORDERING the Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is CONTINUED to 3/30/2017. (Washington, S) Modified on 1/11/2017 (Washington, S).
ANDREW J. FRACKMAN (pro hac forthcoming)
AMY LAURENDEAU (S.B. #198321)
CARLOS M. LAZATIN (pro hac forthcoming)
HANNAH Y. CHANOINE (pro hac forthcoming)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Times Square Tower
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036-6524
Attorneys for Defendant
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARLETTA STINE, on behalf of herself and
those similarly situated,
Case No. 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB
SAMSUNG’S DEADLINE FOR
RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
Having reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation Continuing Samsung’s Response Deadline, and,
good cause appearing, the deadline for Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to respond
to Plaintiff Stine’s complaint is hereby continued until March 30, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2017
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR
RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT, 2:16-CV02397-MCE-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?