Stine v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2017 ORDERING the Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is CONTINUED to 3/30/2017. (Washington, S) Modified on 1/11/2017 (Washington, S).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

ANDREW J. FRACKMAN (pro hac forthcoming)
AMY LAURENDEAU (S.B. #198321)
CARLOS M. LAZATIN (pro hac forthcoming)
HANNAH Y. CHANOINE (pro hac forthcoming)
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Times Square Tower
7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036-6524
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO

12
13

MARLETTA STINE, on behalf of herself and
those similarly situated,

14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:16-cv-02397-MCE-EFB
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION CONTINUING
SAMSUNG’S DEADLINE FOR
RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC.,
Defendant.

19
20

Having reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation Continuing Samsung’s Response Deadline, and,

21

good cause appearing, the deadline for Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to respond

22

to Plaintiff Stine’s complaint is hereby continued until March 30, 2017.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2017

25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR
RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT, 2:16-CV02397-MCE-EFB