Shields v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 16

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/30/17 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DERRICK LAMORIS SHIELDS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:16-cv-2399 JAM CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
A recent court notice was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal

16
17

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that

18

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

19
20

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

21

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

22

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

23

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

24

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

25

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen

26

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: August 30, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
shie2399.33a

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2