Shields v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 16

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/30/17 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DERRICK LAMORIS SHIELDS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:16-cv-2399 JAM CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 A recent court notice was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 16 17 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that 18 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 19 20 prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 21 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 22 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 23 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 24 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 25 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 26 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: August 30, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 shie2399.33a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?