Howard v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/27/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiffs Fourth and Fifth claims are hereby deemed abandoned; Stella Nze and Robert Padilla DISMISSED from action. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189
NICOLE M. CAHILL, CSB No. 287165
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, California 95864-5923
Tel: (916) 974-8500 Fax: (916) 974-8510
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento,
Robert Padilla and Stella Nze
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SEMAJ HOWARD,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02400-JAM-DB
vs.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ROBERT
PADILLA, as an individual, STELLA NZE,
as an individual, DOES 1-75,
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS AND
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
PADILLA AND NZE
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20
21
22
Based on the concurrently filed Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is hereby
ordered that:
23
1. Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fifth claims are hereby deemed abandoned;
24
2. Defendants Robert Padilla and Stella Nze are hereby dismissed from Action No. 2:16-
25
26
27
28
cv-02400-JAM-DB, Semaj Howard v. County of Sacramento, et al.
Dated: December 27, 2017
/s/ John A. Mendez___________________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS
AND DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PADILLA AND NZE
Page 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?