Howard v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/27/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiffs Fourth and Fifth claims are hereby deemed abandoned; Stella Nze and Robert Padilla DISMISSED from action. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189 NICOLE M. CAHILL, CSB No. 287165 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, California 95864-5923 Tel: (916) 974-8500 Fax: (916) 974-8510 Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento, Robert Padilla and Stella Nze 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEMAJ HOWARD, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 CASE NO. 2:16-CV-02400-JAM-DB vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ROBERT PADILLA, as an individual, STELLA NZE, as an individual, DOES 1-75, ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS AND DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PADILLA AND NZE Defendants. 16 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 21 22 Based on the concurrently filed Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that: 23 1. Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fifth claims are hereby deemed abandoned; 24 2. Defendants Robert Padilla and Stella Nze are hereby dismissed from Action No. 2:16- 25 26 27 28 cv-02400-JAM-DB, Semaj Howard v. County of Sacramento, et al. Dated: December 27, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez___________________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS AND DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS PADILLA AND NZE Page 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?