Johnson v. Tackett et al

Filing 13

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/6/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/27/2017. Discovery due by 12/18/2017. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 2/9/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/29/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Bench Trial set for 8/13/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

SCOTT JOHNSON,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:16-CV-2414 KJM DB

v.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

LAURIE ELIZABETH TACKETT, et al.,

14

ORDER

Defendants.

15
16
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on January 19, 2017. Teresa

17
18

Allen appeared for plaintiff; Richard Morin appeared for defendants.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on January 10, 2017, and

19
20

discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following

21

orders:

22

I.

SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without

23
24

leave of court, good cause having been shown.

25

II.

26

ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without

27

leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth

28

Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
1

1

III.

JURISDICTION/VENUE

2
3

Plaintiff contends jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2343(a)(3)
and (a)(4) and 42 U.S.C. § 12101.

4

Defendants deny plaintiff’s claims and allege their property is ADA-compliant and

5

that this court therefore lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants plan to seek dismissal of the

6

complaint on these grounds. Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be heard no later than March

7

24, 2017.

8
9

Venue is not disputed.
IV.

10

DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) have been

11

completed. All discovery shall be completed by December 18, 2017, with initial discovery

12

focusing on subject matter jurisdiction. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery

13

shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to

14

discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has

15

been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the

16

magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned

17

magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact

18

are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned

19

magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set

20

in this order, except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such

21

modification does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.

22

The court approves the parties’ agreement to increase the limits under Federal

23

Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1) to forty-five (45).

24

V.

25

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other

26

parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial

27

not later than November 27, 2017. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report

28

prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
2

1

By December 27, 2017, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a

2

supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an

3

expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation

4

has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation

5

shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated

6

above.

7

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all

8

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert

9

witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering

10

the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably

11

anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were

12

promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made

13

available for deposition.

14

For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used

15

at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which

16

include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert

17

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the

18

case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert

19

for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,

20

retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the

21

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state

22

in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.

23

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render

24

an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and

25

complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted

26

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition

27

taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by January 8, 2018.

28

/////
3

1

VI.

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

2

All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining

3

orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than February 9, 2018.1 The

4

parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s

5

website.

6
7

All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:

8

(a)

The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and

9

(b)

When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the

10

opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.

11

Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to

12

the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,

13

652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).

14

The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are

15

encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral

16

argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school

17

will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s

18

schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it

19

appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.

20

The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty

21

(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases

22

must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.

23

Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,

24

counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the

25

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate

26

the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party

27
28

1

Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4

1

considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel

2

should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for

3

summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution

4

by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during

5

the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the

6

motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and

7

confer efforts.

8
9

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off

10

date may constitute waiver of such issue.

11

VII.

12

SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the

13

prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the

14

record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be

15

directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be

16

governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the

17

discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the

18

public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of

19

sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has

20

identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the

21

opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of

22

sealing or redaction from the court.

23

VIII.

24

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for June 29, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. At least one

25

of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial

26

Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to

27

attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the

28

case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
5

1

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final

2

Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of

3

witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference

4

statement by June 8, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the

5

matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local

6

Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:

7
8
9

- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.

10

Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to

11

identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of

12

each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.

13

Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core

14

disputed facts in the above manner.

15

- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s

16

motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be

17

necessary before the first day of trial.

18

- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory

19

underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core

20

undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the

21

parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.

22
23
24

Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to

25

attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they

26

propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief

27

statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each

28

party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
6

1

Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to

2

the Final Pretrial Order.

3

Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed

4

alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for

5

plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be

6

marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be

7

then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened

8

together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include

9

excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and

10

defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation

11

the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that

12

all concerned will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a number and a letter.

13

The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent possible, provide

14

joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.

15

The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of

16

witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the

17

standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a

18

party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

19
20

Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.

21
22
23

Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of

24

Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the

25

formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)

26

the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof

27

and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference

28
7

1

Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2

2

A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary

3

sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as

4

the court deems appropriate.

5

Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,

6

counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety

7

(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: [e-mail].

8

IX.

MOTIONS IN LIMINE

9

All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement.

10

In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of

11

trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their

12

final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final

13

pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in

14

limine as necessary.

15

The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device

16

designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon

17

dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions

18

in limine.

19

X.

20

TRIAL SETTING
The bench trial is set for August 13, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial

21

length of approximately two (2) to three (3) days. Trial briefs are due by July 30, 2018.

22

XI.

23

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be

24

set at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the

25

/////

26

2

27
28

“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
8

1

event that an earlier court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute

2

Resolution Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing.

3

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at

4

any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge

5

has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate

6

instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.

7

XII.

8

MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

9

Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court

10

upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute

11

good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does

12

not constitute good cause.

13

As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery

14

dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the

15

schedule of the case.

16

XIII.

17
18
19
20

OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless

objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 6, 2017

21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
9