Maestas v. State of California et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/21/2017 ORDERING, within 21 days, petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LENNY ROSS MAESTAS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-2421-MCE-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a county inmate without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 17, 2017, respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that 19 there is no longer a case or controversy to support jurisdiction. Petitioner has not filed an 20 opposition or a statement of no opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss. 21 A responding party’s failure “to file written opposition or to file a statement of no 22 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may 23 result in the imposition of sanctions.” L. R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the 24 Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or 25 Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 110. The court may dismiss this action 26 with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See 27 Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in 28 dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended 1 1 complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 2 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule 3 regarding notice of change of address affirmed). 4 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this order, 5 petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. 6 Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 7 without prejudice. 8 Dated: February 21, 2017. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?