Bassett v Kernan

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/2017 ORDERING petitioner shall have until 2/9/2017, to file an optional reply to respondent's opposition to her request for a Rhines stay.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAMARA NICOLE BASSETT, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2428 JAM AC P v. ORDER SCOTT M. KERNAN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of 17 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 28, 2016, respondent filed a motion 19 to dismiss which is set for hearing on February 15, 2017. ECF No. 6. In response to the motion 20 to dismiss, petitioner requested that, if the court found her petition timely but her ineffective 21 assistance of counsel claim unexhausted, she be granted a stay under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 22 269 (2005). ECF No. 12 at 5-7. Although the request for stay was not put forth as a separate 23 motion, in the interest of judicial efficiency and so that all issues are fully briefed prior to the 24 February 15, 2017 hearing, the court will allow petitioner to reply to respondent’s opposition to 25 the request for stay. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall have until February 9, 2 2017, to file an optional reply to respondent’s opposition to her request for a Rhines stay. 3 DATED: February 2, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?