Lipelt v. Unum Life Insurance Company

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III on 4/12/17 ORDERING the above-entitled action is REFERRED to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. The parties agree to complete mediation on or before 6/17/17.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Julia Campins – CA State Bar No. 238023 Hillary Benham-Baker – CA State Bar No. 265019 CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER 935 Moraga Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, CA 94549 Tel. (415) 373-5333 Fax (415) 373-5334 julia@cbbllp.com hillary@cbbllp.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Anna Martin (CA Bar No. 154279) Grant Ingram (CA Bar No. 242785) MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90017-2611 Telephone: (213) 620-0300 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930 amartin@mmhllp.com gingram@mmhllp.com Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 GERALD LIPELT, Plaintiff, vs. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16-02433-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM REFERRAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 271 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 271, the parties hereby agree to submit the above-entitled action to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. The parties agree to complete mediation on or VDRP STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 1 1 before June 17, 2017. 2 3 4 Dated: March 27, 2017 Respectfully submitted, CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER 5 By: 6 7 8 Dated: March 27, 2017 /s/ Hillary Benham-Baker Hillary Benham-Baker Attorneys for Plaintiff Respectfully submitted, 9 RIMAC MARTIN 10 By: 11 12 /s/ Grant E. Ingram Grant E. Ingram Attorneys for Defendant 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. April 12, 2017 DATED: __________________ United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 VDRP STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?