Hiemstra v. Credit One Bank

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/25/17. Plaintiff's notice regarding hearing on a discovery disagreement 11 is denied w/o prejudice and the 5/31/17 hearing date is vacated. (Hinkle, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RHONDA HIEMSTRA, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2437-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CREDIT ONE BANK, Defendant. 15 16 On April 28, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of hearing regarding a discovery disagreement, 17 setting the matter for hearing on May 31, 2017. ECF No. 11. Local Rule 251(a) provides that the 18 Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least seven days before the 19 scheduled hearing date or, in this instance, by May 24, 2017. Local Rule 251(a) also provides 20 that the hearing on a discovery motion may be dropped from calendar without prejudice if the 21 Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement is not timely filed. Id. 22 Although the deadline has passed, the docket reflects that no Joint Statement re Discovery 23 Disagreement has been filed in connection with plaintiff’s motion. Therefore, the notice of 24 hearing regarding discovery dispute (ECF No. 11) is denied without prejudice and the May 31, 25 2017 hearing is vacated. 26 27 28 So Ordered. DATED: May 25, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?