Hiemstra v. Credit One Bank
Filing
25
ORDER re 22 Notice of Discovery Disagreement. As no L.R. 251 joint statement re discovery disagreement has been timely filed, the 11/1/17 Hearing is dropped from calendar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/17.(Hinkle, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RHONDA HIEMSTRA,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2437-JAM-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CREDIT ONE BANK,
Defendant.
16
17
On September 22, 2017, defendant filed a “notice of hearing of discovery disagreement,”
18
requesting to set a hearing before the undersigned on November 1, 2017. ECF No. 22. Local
19
Rule 251(a) provides that the Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least
20
seven days before the scheduled hearing date or, in this instance, by October 25, 2017. Local
21
Rule 251(a) also provides that the hearing on a discovery matter may be dropped from calendar
22
without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement is not timely filed. Id.
23
Although the deadline has passed, the docket reflects that no Joint Statement re Discovery
24
Disagreement has been filed in connection with defendant’s pleading. Therefore, the November
25
1, 2017 hearing thereon is vacated.
26
So Ordered.
27
DATED: October 26, 2017.
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?