Hiemstra v. Credit One Bank

Filing 25

ORDER re 22 Notice of Discovery Disagreement. As no L.R. 251 joint statement re discovery disagreement has been timely filed, the 11/1/17 Hearing is dropped from calendar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/17.(Hinkle, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RHONDA HIEMSTRA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-2437-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CREDIT ONE BANK, Defendant. 16 17 On September 22, 2017, defendant filed a “notice of hearing of discovery disagreement,” 18 requesting to set a hearing before the undersigned on November 1, 2017. ECF No. 22. Local 19 Rule 251(a) provides that the Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least 20 seven days before the scheduled hearing date or, in this instance, by October 25, 2017. Local 21 Rule 251(a) also provides that the hearing on a discovery matter may be dropped from calendar 22 without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement is not timely filed. Id. 23 Although the deadline has passed, the docket reflects that no Joint Statement re Discovery 24 Disagreement has been filed in connection with defendant’s pleading. Therefore, the November 25 1, 2017 hearing thereon is vacated. 26 So Ordered. 27 DATED: October 26, 2017. 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?