Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of Northern Paiute Indians et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by William H Orrick, III on 1/12/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to file any response re 10 Motion to Dismiss by 1/18/2017. The defendants' shall file their reply by 1/25/2017. The hearing will remain, as scheduled, on 2/8/2017 at 1:30 p.m. All briefing on future motions shall comply with the Reassignment Order. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DUANNA KNIGHTON,

Case No. 2:16-cv-2438 (WHO)

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA of
NORTHERN PAIUTE INDIANS, et al.,

11
United States District Court
Eastern District of California

10

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
COMPLY WITH BRIEFING
SCHEDULE OUTLINED IN DKT. NO. 5

Defendants.

Re: Dkt. No. 10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed on December 16, 2016, and noticed for hearing on
February 8, 2017. Dkt. No. 10. In accordance with the Order for Case Reassignment, any
opposition was due no later than 14 days after the motion was filed, or December 30, 2016, and
any reply was due 7 days after the opposition, or January 6, 2017. See Dkt. No. 5. No opposition
has been filed.
The plaintiff is directed to file any opposition to the defendants’ motion no later than
January 18, 2017. The defendants’ shall file their reply by January 25, 2017. The hearing will
remain, as scheduled, on February 8, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. All briefing on future motions shall
comply with the Reassignment Order. See Dkt. No. 5.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 12, 2017
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge