Jordan v. California Department of Justice

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/08/17 ORDERING that the scheduling order issued by District Judge Kimberly J.Muller, ECF No. 19 , remains appropriate. All deadlines previously set remain binding on the parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COLLETTE JORDAN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-02442-KJM-AC

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE,
Defendants.

16
17

Following the withdrawal of counsel, plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and all

18
19

pretrial matters are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

20

ECF No. 22 at 23. As noted in the minute order issued December 1, 2017, all motions should

21

now be noticed for hearing before the undersigned. ECF No. 23. Upon review of the docket, the

22

undersigned has determined that the scheduling order issued by District Judge Kimberly J.

23

Muller, ECF No. 19, remains appropriate. All deadlines previously set remain binding on the

24

parties.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 8, 2017