Beaton v. California Medical Facility
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/9/2018 DIRECTING plaintiff to either dismiss this action or file an amended complaint within 14 days of this order. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL NIVARD BEATON,
No. 2:16-cv-2446 DB P
12
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
14
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging claims arising
19
from his medical treatment at California Medical Facility. (ECF No. 1.)
On September 27, 2017 the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, found he failed to state a
20
21
claim, and gave him leave to amend. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was directed to file an amended
22
complaint within thirty days and was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would
23
result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended
24
complaint, notified the court that he is dismissing this action, or otherwise responded to the
25
court’s orders.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
26
27
order, plaintiff shall either dismiss this action or file an amended complaint. If he fails to do so,
28
////
1
1
the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply with court
2
orders. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
3
Dated: February 9, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
DLB:12
DLB1/ORDERS/PRISONER.CIVIL.RIGHTS/beat.2446.ocs
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?