Williams v. Bockus et al
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/3/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TROY WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2447 JAM CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ROBERT BOCKUS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
By order filed March 23, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave
18
to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff
19
has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
20
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff
21
was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current
22
address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of
23
the party is fully effective.
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after
28
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
1
1
the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
2
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
3
waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.
4
1991).
5
Dated: May 3, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
will2447.fta
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?