Fox v. Vision Service Plan
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/23/2017 ORDERING the Designation of Expert Witnesses is RESET to 2/2/2018 and 2/9/2018; Discovery Deadline is RESET to 4/6/2018; Dispositive Motion filing Deadline is RESET to 5/8/2018; Dispositive motion hearing is RESET to 6/5/2018; Joint pretrial statement is DUE on 7/20/2018; Final Pretrial Conference is RESET to 7/27/2018 at 11:00 a.m; and Jury Trial is RESET to 9/10/2018 at 9:00 a.m. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
CRAIG S STEINBERG, O.D. (CA SBN 181902)
LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG S STEINBERG
5737 Kanan Rd., #540
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
Telephone: 818-879-7919
Facsimile: 818-879-7950
craig@csteinberglaw.com
4
5
For plaintiff Patricia Fox, O.D.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
12
Case No.
PATRICIA FOX, O.D.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING SCHEDULING ORDER
DATES
vs.
15
VISION SERVICE PLAN; DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
16
2:16-cv-02456-JAM-DB
Defendant.
17
18
19
Plaintiff, Patricia Fox, O.D., and Defendant, Vision Service Plan (“VSP”), by and through
their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, agree, and request as follows:
RECITALS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, this Court issued a scheduling order on December 14, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Court set the following schedule:
Deadline/Hearing
Due/Set
Designation of Expert Witnesses
7/21/2017
Discovery Deadline
09/29/2017
Dispositive Motion Deadline
11/07/2017
Final Pretrial Conference
01/26/2018 at 11:00 AM
Jury Trial
3/12/2018 at 09:00 AM
1
STIPULATIONAND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING ORDER DATES
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2017, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary
Injunction and issued the Preliminary Injunction; and
WHEREAS, Vision Service Plan appealed the Court’s order to the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals; and
5
WHEREAS, the appeal challenges, among other things, the Court’s legal ruling on
6
whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts 28 CRC 1300.71.38, and the Court’s legal rulings
7
with respect to both procedural and substantive unconscionability; and
8
9
WHEREAS, the appellate briefing is now complete, but the 9th Circuit has indicated that
it will set oral arguments in October 2017; and
10
WHEREAS, the ruling of the 9th Circuit is potentially determinative of one or more core
11
legal issues in this case and/or could significantly affect the nature and scope of relevant
12
evidence; and
13
WHEREAS, both plaintiff and defendant believe it would be in the best interest of the
14
parties and the Court to allow the appeals process to be completed before proceeding to litigating
15
and bringing the matter to trial and before investing substantial amounts of time and money into
16
discovery, expert witnesses, depositions, and dispositive motions; and
17
WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have met and conferred and both believe it would be
18
appropriate to continue the pending Scheduling Order dates for at least six months to allow time
19
to obtain the ruling of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals;
20
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through counsel, stipulate and request that the Court
21
continue the dates set in the Dec. 14, 2016, scheduling order.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
Dated: June 21, 2017
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP
24
25
26
/s/ Andrew H. Struve
_____________________________________
Andrew H. Struve
Attorneys for Defendant Vision Service Plan
27
28
2
STIPULATIONAND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING ORDER DATES
1
Dated: June 21, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG S STEINBERG, O.D., PC
2
/s/ Craig S Steinberg, O.D.
_____________________________________
Craig S Steinberg, O.D.
Attorney for Plaintiff Patricia Fox, O.D.
3
4
5
6
7
ORDER
8
The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and finding good cause to
9
continue the dates as requested, hereby orders as follows:
10
The new dates shall be as follows:
11
Deadline/Hearing
New Due/Set
12
Designation of Expert Witnesses
2/2/2018 and 2/9/2018
Discovery Deadline
4/6/2018___________
Dispositive Motion filing Deadline
5/8/2018___________
Dispositive motion hearing
6/5/2018___________
Joint pretrial statement due
7/20/2018__________
Final Pretrial Conference
7/27/2018 at 11:00 a.m.
Jury Trial
9/10/2018 at 9:00 a.m._
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: 6/23/2017
21
22
23
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
Hon. John Mendez
United States District Court Judge
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATIONAND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING ORDER DATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?