Hicks v. Arya

Filing 23

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/09/17 ORDERING that the 19 03/16/17 Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED; the 22 Motion for Reconsideration is terminated. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL J. HICKS,

12

No. 2:16-cv-2465 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

AFSHIN ARYA,

15

ORDER

Defendant.

16
17

On March 27, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

18

order filed March 16, 2017, granting defendant’s motion to be excluded from the Post-Screening

19

ADR project. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

20

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds

21

that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

23
24
25
26
27
28

magistrate judge filed March 16, 2017, ECF No. 19, is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2017