Hicks v. Arya

Filing 23

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/09/17 ORDERING that the 19 03/16/17 Order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED; the 22 Motion for Reconsideration is terminated. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. HICKS, 12 No. 2:16-cv-2465 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 AFSHIN ARYA, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 On March 27, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s 18 order filed March 16, 2017, granting defendant’s motion to be excluded from the Post-Screening 19 ADR project. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld 20 unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds 21 that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 22 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 23 24 25 26 27 28 magistrate judge filed March 16, 2017, ECF No. 19, is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?