Anderson v. Yolo County Social Services Department

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/15/17 ORDERING that the Scheduling Conference is hereby CONTINUED to 6/5/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A Joint Status must be filed on behalf of the parties on or before 5/22/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

5

CORI R. SARNO, ESQ., SB No. 230559
Email: [e-mail]
SEAN D. O’DOWD, ESQ., SB No. 296320
Email: [e-mail]
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825

6

Telephone: [phone]

1
2
3
4

Telecopier: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF YOLO, erroneously sued herein as YOLO COUNTY
SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Robert C. Bowman Jr. (SBN 232388)
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
3841 North Freeway Blvd., Suite 185
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff,
IVY ANDERSON

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

IVY ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,

21
vs.
22
23

YOLO COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT,

24
Defendants.
25
26

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER
TO CONTINUE THE STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE

///

28

Case No.: 2:16-cv-02466-WBS-DB

///

27

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

///
-1STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO CONTINUED THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE

1

The Pretrial Scheduling Conference is set for February 27, 2017. Based on that date, the

2

parties were to meet and confer and prepare a Joint Pretrial Scheduling Statement by February

3

13, 2017. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was under submission as of February 13, 2017. On

4

February 14, 2017, the Court issued its Memorandum and Order re: Motion to Dismiss (Dkt #8)

5

granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has 20 days, or until March 6, 2017, to file

6

her Second Amended Complaint. Given the current ruling on the motion to dismiss, the parties

7

request that the Pretrial Scheduling Conference be continued until at least 60 days after the

8

Defendant answers the operative complaint, which interval would give counsel the time and

9

ability to ascertain the work required to resolve the disputed facts and any further legal issues.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: February 15, 2017

LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Robert C. Bowman, Jr.
By:_________________________________
ROBERT C. BOWMAN JR.
Attorney for Plaintiff

13
14
15
16
17

Dated: February 15, 2017

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

18
/s/ Cori R. Sarno
By:_________________________________
CORI R. SARNO
SEAN D. O’DOWD
Attorneys for Defendant

19
20
21
118873

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO CONTINUED THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE

ORDER

1
2

Good cause appearing, the Scheduling Conference is hereby continued to June 5, 2017 at

3

1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 (WBS). A Joint Status must be filed on behalf of the parties on or

4

before May 22, 2017.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: February 15, 2017

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO CONTINUED THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE