Osorio et al v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center

Filing 5

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/9/16ORDERING that both plaintiffs show cause, within 14 days, why this action should not be dismissed.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

CARLOS DANIEL OSORIO, ANIL
KUMAR,
Plaintiffs,

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2486 KJN P

RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL
CENTER,

16

Defendants.

17
On November 7, 2016, plaintiff Kumar consented to proceed before the undersigned for

18
19

all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By an order filed October 31, 2016, plaintiffs were ordered

20

to file completed in forma pauperis affidavits and certified copies of their inmate trust account

21

statements, and were cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this

22

action be dismissed. In addition, the plaintiffs were warned that their claims would be severed so

23

that each plaintiff would proceed in his own, separate, civil rights action. Thirty days have now

24

passed, and neither plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee,

25

or otherwise responded to the October 31, 2016 order.1

26

1

27
28

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff Osorio’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff
Osorio was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his
current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record
address of the party is fully effective.
1

1

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that both plaintiffs show cause,

2

within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order

3

will result in an order dismissing this action without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

4

Dated: December 9, 2016

5
6
/kuma2486.osc2

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2