Baxter v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/10/17 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY HARRISON BAXTER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2495 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 636(c). By order filed December 1, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
20
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and
21
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
23
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
24
Dated: January 10, 2017
25
26
27
/baxt2495.fta.con
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
