Johnson v. Johnson, et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/31/17: This action is DISMISSED. All parties to bear its/their own attorneys' fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAURICE D. JOHNSON, SR.

7
8
9
10
11
12

CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051
Email: [e-mail]
WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589
Email: [e-mail]
701 University Avenue, Suite 110
Sacramento, CA 95825
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

13
14

Attorneys for Defendants CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON,
JAMES McFARLAND, and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

MAURICE D. JOHNSON, SR.,

NO. 2:16-cv-02502-JAM-AC

19
Plaintiff,

20

vs.

21
22
23
24
25

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON; JAMES
McFARLAND, COUNTY OF
SACRAMENTO; CITY OF VACAVILLE;
and DOES I-XX, inclusive,

ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS CHRISTOPHER
JOHNSON,
JAMES McFARLAND AND
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

26
27
28

///
///

Johnson – [Proposed] Order Granting Dismissal

1

1

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS

2

HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action against Defendants CHRISTOPHER

3

JOHNSON, JAMES McFARLAND and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO is dismissed with

4

prejudice. All parties to bear its/their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

5
6
7

Dated: 10/31/2017

/s/ John A. Mendez______________

8
9

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Johnson – [Proposed] Order Granting Dismissal

2