Tarleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/22/17, ORDERING that this matter is SET for hearing on 7/26/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26, 8th Floor. Plaintiff is directed to personally appear to be heard on the matter of counsel's in tended withdrawal. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to appear at the hearing telephonically. Prior to the final adjudication of this motion, plaintiff's counsel must take whatever actions she deems necessary in light of pending deadlines. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONITA TARLETON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-02516 AC
v.
ORDER
NANCY A. BERYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as the attorney
18
19
of record for plaintiff Donita Tarleton. ECF No. 19. This matter is set for hearing to allow
20
plaintiff an opportunity to be heard on this matter, and to determine whether withdrawal is
21
appropriate at this juncture. The court orders as follows:
22
(1) This matter is set for hearing on July 26, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26, 8th Floor.
23
(2) Plaintiff Donita Tarleton is directed to personally appear to be heard on the matter of
24
counsel’s intended withdrawal. If plaintiff wishes to appear telephonically, she is directed
25
to contact Courtroom Deputy Valerie Callen at (916) 930-4199. Plaintiff’s failure to
26
appear or respond to this order will be construed as non-opposition to counsel’s
27
withdrawal;
28
////
1
1
2
3
4
5
(3) Plaintiff’s counsel Denise Bourgeois Haley is directed to appear at the hearing
telephonically; and
(4) Prior to the final adjudication of this motion, plaintiff’s counsel must take whatever
actions she deems necessary in light of pending deadlines.
DATED: June 22, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?