Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 53

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/4/2022 DENYING 47 Motion for Reconsideration; AFFIRMING 44 Order. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-CV-2532-WBS-DMC-P

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42

18
19

U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 47, for reconsideration of

20

the Magistrate Judge’s order at ECF No. 44 denying appointment of counsel.
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s

21
22

order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

23

file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly

24

erroneous or contrary to law. The order at ECF No. 44 is, therefore, affirmed.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 47, is denied; and

3

2.

The Magistrate Judge’s order at ECF No. 44 is affirmed.

4

Dated: October 4, 2022

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2