Houston v. Eldridge et al

Filing 127

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/2020 ORDERING within 7 days, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to respond to defendants' motion to stay, and plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. The hearing set for 1/9/2020, before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman regarding defendants' motion to stay is VACATED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM HOUSTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 16-cv-2561 WBS KJN P v. ORDER L. ELDRIDGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 5, 2019, defendants filed a motion to stay. (ECF No. 125.) 19 Defendants noticed the motion to stay for hearing before the undersigned on January 9, 2020. 20 (Id.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to defendants’ motion to stay. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Within seven days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions 23 should not be imposed for his failure to respond defendants’ motion to stay, and 24 plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion; and 25 2. The hearing set for January 9, 2020, before the undersigned regarding defendants’ motion to stay is vacated. 26 27 Dated: January 7, 2020 hou2561.osc 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?