Sahaj v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/17 ORDERING that defendant's time to file her summary judgment motion is EXTENDED by 30 days to 5/31/2017. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ASIM H. MODI Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-977-8952 Facsimile: 415-744-0134 Email: Asim.Modi@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 NICOLE ANN SAHAJ, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-2563-CKD ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ) EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to 22 extend Defendant’s time to file her summary judgment motion with the Court by 30 days to May 23 31, 2017, and that all other scheduling dates set forth in the Court’s Case Management Order 24 25 26 27 28 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). -1- 1 shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time in this 2 matter, and she requests it in good faith and without any intent to prolong proceedings unduly. 3 There is good cause for this extension request because counsel for Defendant has 4 workload issues that preclude filing her summary judgment motion by May 1, 2017. In 5 particular, counsel for Defendant is currently responsible for reviewing the excerpts of record 6 and drafting the Commissioner’s answering brief in two Social Security cases before the Ninth 7 Circuit. Moreover, counsel for Defendant is currently responsible for drafting briefs and 8 summary judgment motions and negotiating (or litigating) attorney fee matters pursuant to the 9 Equal Access to Justice Act before the district courts within the Ninth Circuit. Counsel for 10 Defendant is currently conducting discovery, drafting substantive pleadings, and preparing for a 11 hearing in two personnel-related litigation matters pending before the Merit Systems Protection 12 Board. Additionally, counsel for Defendant is serving on nationwide intra-agency teams charged 13 with implementing the terms of the class action settlement reached in Hart v. Berryhill (N.D.Cal. 14 No. 3:15-cv-623-JST) and coordinating outreach and training to the Social Security 15 Administration’s Office of Disability Adjudication and Review. 16 17 Counsel for Defendant apologizes to Plaintiff and the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. 18 19 Respectfully submitted, 20 21 Date: April 25, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Asim H. Modi for Brian C. Shapiro* BRIAN C. SHAPIRO *Authorized by email on April 25, 2017 Attorney for Plaintiff 25 26 27 28 Date: April 25, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration -2- 1 By: 2 3 4 /s/ Asim H. Modi ASIM H. MODI Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 5 ORDER 6 7 8 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED 9 Dated: April 27, 2017 10 11 12 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?