Martinez et al. v. City of West Sacramento et al.
Filing
123
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/15/2019 CONTINUING Hearing on 121 Motion to Dismiss to 12/19/2019, at 02:00 PM, in Courtroom 2 (TLN), before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Opposition to Motion due 12/5/2019. Reply to Opposition due 12/12/2019. (York, M)
1
4
Douglas Robert Thorn (SBN 133521)
THORN | LAW FIRM
1380 Lead Hill Boulevard
First Floor, Suite 106
Roseville, California 95661
(916) 768-9311
5
A orneys for Plain ffs
6
7
2
3
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
Case No. 2:16‐cv‐02566‐TLN‐EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUNE
MOTION HEARING
23
Sonny Mar nez; Jessica Mar nez,
individually and as the mother and Guardian
Ad Litem for minors VJM, GRM, ARM, and
EVM; and Joann Ramirez,
Plain ffs,
vs.
City of West Sacramento; West Sacramento
Police Department; Jason M. Winger; David
M. Stallions; Michael Duggins; Kenneth E.
Fellows; Carl J. Crouch; Eric M. Palmer;
Ma hew S. Luiz; Louis Cameron; David
Delani; West Sacramento Doe 1 through 25;
City of Stockton; Stockton Police
Department; Dan T. Zwicky; Stockton Doe
26 through 50; Yolo County; A orney Robert
A. Gorman; A orney Ryan J. Couzens; Yolo
County Doe 51 through 75; Rafael
Altamirano; and Doe 76 through 100,
Defendants.
28
1
1
Plain ffs and the City of Stockton defendants (other than defendant Zwciky) agree as
2
follows:
3
Plain ffs’ counsel asked for a s pula on to enlarge me to brief and hear the mo on to
4
dismiss filed by the City of Stockton defendants (except for Zwicky) due to his recent health
5
issue and hospitaliza on.
6
7
Plain ffs’ counsel and counsel for the moving par es agree to enlarge me as con nue
the hearing on the mo on as follows:
8
Opposi on to Mo on due 12/05/2019
9
Reply to Opposi on due 12/12/2019
10
11
Hearing con nued to 12/19/2019
12
SO STIPULATED
13
14
Respec ully submi ed November 15, 2019,
15
/s/ Douglas R. Thorn
16
Douglas Robert Thorn (SBN 133521)
THORN | LAW FIRM
1380 Lead Hill Boulevard
First Floor, Suite 106
Roseville, California 95661
(916) 768-9311
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Respec ully submi ed November 15, 2019,
/s/ Jamil R. Ghannam
Jamil R. Ghannam
Deputy City A orney
City of Stockton
A orney for Moving Par es
26
27
28
2
1
2
The Court has considered the s pula on of the par es and finds good cause to adopt the
3
s pula on as the order of the Court. The new briefing and hearing schedule is as follows:
ORDER
4
Opposi on to Mo on due December 5, 2019.
5
Reply to Opposi on due December 12, 2019.
6
Hearing con nued to December 19, 2019 at 2:00 PM.
7
8
9
DATED: November15, 2019
Honorable Troy L. Nunley
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?