Martinez et al. v. City of West Sacramento et al.

Filing 42

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/24/17: The time for the United States and defendant Dan T. Zwicky to respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including March 30, 2017. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
Attorneys for the United States
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MARTINEZ, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12

v.

13

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO; et al.,
Defendants.

14

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02566-TLN-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
TIME FOR FEDERAL DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT

15
16

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

17

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the United States and Defendant Dan T. Zwicky (the Federal

18

Defendants), by and through their counsel of record Gregory T. Broderick, Assistant United States

19

Attorney, and Plaintiffs Sonny Martinez, Joann Ramirez, and Jessica Martinez, individually and as

20

the mother and Guardian Ad Litem for minors VJM, GRM, ARM, and EVM (collectively, the

21

Parties), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree to an initial extension of time of

22

30 days in which to respond to the Complaint, up to and including March 30, 2017. At present, the

23

date service was complete is unclear and Plaintiff and the Federal Defendants are attempting to

24

determine whether they may reach a more efficient resolution of this dispute. Rather than litigate

25

this matter at this time, the Parties request this extension to determine whether they can complete

26

their agreement-in-principle to narrow this dispute, which would be more efficient for the Court and

27

for all involved. Therefore, the Parties submit that there is good cause to grant this extension of time

28

to conserve their resources, and this Court’s resources.

29
30

Stip. and Order re Responsive Pleading for Federal Defendants

1

1

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

2

DATED: February 23, 2017
By: /s/ Douglas R. Thorn (authorized 02/23/2017)
DOUGLAS R. THORN
Attorney for Plaintiffs

3
4
5

DATED: February 23, 2017

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney

6
7
8

By: /s/ Gregory T. Broderick
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Stip. and Order re Responsive Pleading for Federal Defendants

2

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

DATED: February 24, 2017

3

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Stip. and Order re Responsive Pleading for Federal Defendants

3